Warning: this page is here as a rant about the injustice in our laws and system that protects criminals at the public's expense.
I am thankful this crime was prosecuted, and especially thankful to the detective, investigator, district attorney and judge that made it happen. By all means, if you know of a victim of sweetheart swindle, report the fraud to your local police. But first, see my links page. You may want to first gather some evidence and further knowledge and guidance. And understand that justice will not necessarily be served by the authorities. "We are only interested in jail time." In other words, we will do nothing to recover any of your loss from the crooks.
I doubt this case would have been prosecuted without my incriminating evidence and testimony. This is why the gypsies can usually get away with it by completely destroying their victims. Search the internet to see what I mean. But I refused to give up and refused to be too humiliated to fight back. But even if you do have evidence, the police could still ignore you. Read Jack Olson's Hastened to the Grave where murderous Tene Bimbo gypsy sweetheart swindlers were ignored by police for years in San Francisco.
WARNING: I am not a lawyer. I am just an engineer reading the California Code and assuming it means literally what it says. If you can explain to me why these codes should go unenforced, I would appreciate it.
In California, there are actually laws on the books that appear to implement justice. In the case of theft, for example, the intent seems to be to actually return the amount stolen to the victim. Apparently these good laws can be routinely ignored by law enforcement, at least to the extent they can get away with it.
Penal Code 186.11 "aggravated white collar crime" definitely applied to the multiple $100,000+ felonies committed by the crooks in my case and yet the court failed to enforce 186.11(e)(1) to protect the stolen assets:
Instead, they gave the stolen property, including property that only I had receipts for, to the criminal family who promptly disposed of it and retained all proceeds. The excuse was that the "brother" owned the property and was not a part of the case. Clearly 186.11(e)(1) says otherwise as he was a "third party" holder of stolen assets.CALIFORNIA CODES PENAL CODE SECTION 186.11 (e) (1) If a person is alleged to have committed two or more felonies, as specified in subdivision (a), and the aggravated white collar crime enhancement is also charged, any asset or property that is in the control of that person, and any asset or property that has been transferred by that person to a third party, subsequent to the commission of any criminal act alleged pursuant to subdivision (a), other than in a bona fide purchase, whether found within or outside the state, may be preserved by the superior court in order to pay restitution and fines imposed pursuant to this section. Upon conviction of two or more felonies, as specified in subdivision (a), this property may be levied upon by the superior court to pay restitution and fines imposed pursuant to this section if the existence of facts that would make the person subject to the aggravated white collar crime enhancement have been admitted or found to be true by the trier of fact.
When I requested this from DA, in writing, they again refused to supply the documentation they are required by law to supply! From the beginning, they said that all they are interested in is jail time. They said repeatedly "you will never get your money". They refuse to enforce the law and serve justice beyond jail time. I figure it is probably because it costs too much for them to do the work.PENAL CODE SECTION 1202.4 [...] (f) (5) Except as provided in paragraph (6), in any case in which an order may be entered pursuant to this subdivision, the defendant shall prepare and file a disclosure identifying all assets, income, and liabilities in which the defendant held or controlled a present or future interest as of the date of the defendant's arrest for the crime for which restitution may be ordered. The financial disclosure statements shall be made available to the victim and the board pursuant to Section 1214. The disclosure shall be signed by the defendant upon a form approved or adopted by the Judicial Council for the purpose of facilitating the disclosure. Any defendant who willfully states as true any material matter that he or she knows to be false on the disclosure required by this subdivision is guilty of a misdemeanor, unless this conduct is punishable as perjury or another provision of law provides for a greater penalty. [...] (h) The district attorney may request an order of examination pursuant to the procedures specified in Article 2 (commencing with Section 708.110) of Chapter 6 of Division 2 of Title 9 of Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in order to determine the defendant's financial assets for purposes of collecting on the restitution order. PENAL CODE SECTION 1214 [...] (b) In any case in which a defendant is ordered to pay restitution, the order to pay restitution (1) is deemed a money judgment if the defendant was informed of his or her right to have a judicial determination of the amount and was provided with a hearing, waived a hearing, or stipulated to the amount of the restitution ordered, and (2) shall be fully enforceable by a victim as if the restitution order were a civil judgment, and enforceable in the same manner as is provided for the enforcement of any other money judgment. Upon the victim's request, the court shall provide the victim in whose favor the order of restitution is entered with a certified copy of that order and a copy of the defendant's disclosure pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (f) of Section 1202.4, affidavit or information pursuant to paragraph (5) of subdivision (f) of Section 1202.4, or report pursuant to paragraph (7) of subdivision (f) of Section 1202.4. The court also shall provide this information to the district attorney upon request in connection with an investigation or prosecution involving perjury or the veracity of the information contained within the defendant's financial disclosure. In addition, upon request, the court shall provide the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board with a certified copy of any order imposing a restitution fine or order and a copy of the defendant's disclosure pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (f) of Section 1202.4, affidavit or information pursuant to paragraph (5) of subdivision (f) of Section 1202.4, or report pursuant to paragraph (7) of subdivision (f) of Section 1202.4. A victim shall have access to all resources available under the law to enforce the restitution order, including, but not limited to, access to the defendant's financial records, use of wage garnishment and lien procedures, information regarding the defendant's assets, and the ability to apply for restitution from any fund established for the purpose of compensating victims in civil cases. Any portion of a restitution order that remains unsatisfied after a defendant is no longer on probation or parole is enforceable by the victim pursuant to this section. Victims and the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board shall inform the court whenever an order to pay restitution is satisfied.